Tennis <span id="more-5942"></span>Match Repairing Problems Continue To Make Headlines

Few would accuse anybody of match fixing at Wimbledon, but many state that the practice is extensive among lower-ranked players at smaller events.

Tennis was faced with accusations of match fixing for years: through the infamous match between Nikolay Davydenko and Martin Vassallo Arguello in 2007 that first introduced much for the public to questions in regards to the integrity of matches in some smaller tournaments to suspensions levied against two players earlier this year, there always seems to be something lurking underneath the sport’s surface.

Those concerns were aired again this week in a tale by The Daily Beast, which once again attempted to delve through the details out here about tennis and figure out just how much of an issue match fixing is for the activity.

One 2014 research cited in that tale estimated that one percent of all of the first-round tournament matches might be fixed, which will mean more than 20 matches a year were influenced by gamblers; other estimates and guesses have suggested that numerous matches each week could be fixed, though that’s still an extremely tiny percentage of all expert tennis matches.

Low Pay Leads to Temptation for Lower-Ranked Players

Why is tennis therefore vulnerable to match fixing?

There are always a mixture of factors, many of which help explain why the problem seems most prominent during the lower levels for the ranks that are professional.

First, there’s the obvious fact that tennis (at least in singles play) is a sport that is individual.

There is certainly only one individual that should be bribed in order to get them to throw a match (the exact same issue that leads many to worry extensive integrity issues in boxing and other combat sports), and there are no teammates or substitutes to pick the slack up for a player who is struggling.

That said, nobody is accusing Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal of fixing matches at Wimbledon.

For just one, there’s the actual fact that these matches have a powerful amount of scrutiny on them; perhaps even moreover, though, star tennis players are exceedingly well compensated, meaning it could cost anybody attempting to fix a match at that degree an exorbitant quantity of money, if it could be done at all.

That is not to say that no body attempts. Even Novak Djokovic has told an account of being offered $100,000 to fix a match back 2006.

But players on the Challenger Tour or other low-ranked competitors are not making nearly that much money, and might even lose cash in a provided tournament after travel and coaching expenses are taken into account.

That produces them targets that are prime gamblers seeking to fix a match.

Spot Betting Allows Repairing Without Impacting Match Result

Another problem is the actual fact that gamblers do not also have to repair an entire match to find techniques to profit.

Because many gambling sites and bookmakers provide betting on sets or also individual games, players can reach agreements allowing certain events to occur at the right times to satisfy gamblers while still playing to win overall.

‘One particular fix that is common be to split the first two sets to a predetermined script, then play the 3rd set fairly to figure out which player progresses,’ sports modeler Ian Dorward told Slate earlier this 12 months.

The Tennis Integrity product could be the body tasked with rooting out such dilemmas, and they have actually often made examples of players. In March, Elie Rousset and Walkter Trusendi each received six-month suspensions and fines for violations of anti-corruption guidelines, though not for match-fixing.

But no matter what the Integrity Unit does, it is unlikely in order to alter the tradition that allows lower-ranked players to be incentivized to help gamblers who wish to make sure bets.

That would require a complete change in how compensation works up and down the different levels of expert tennis, something that will most likely not happen any time soon.

New Jersey Online DDoS Attacks on Regulated Web Sites Arrive with Bitcoin Ransom Notes

Current nj-new Jersey DDoS attacks on unnamed regulated web sites were with a ransom note promising future, much more serious assaults should companies not comply. (Image:

DDoS (distributed denial of service) isn’t reality that any gaming that is online ever desires to handle, but some regulated New Jersey sites had to do just that a week ago.

New Jersey’s fledgling online gambling industry has been targeted, apparently for the first-time, by these distributed attacks.

Later final week, at least four unnamed internet sites were derailed by a hacker, or hackers, who flooded the web sites’ bandwidths with traffic, rendering them inoperable, and ultimately taking them offline for around half an hour.

The assaults had been followed by a ransom note for a sum that is undisclosed payable in Bitcoin, with a threat of a far more severe attack to follow.

Maybe Not Brand New, But Irritating

DDoS attacks aren’t anything brand new for the online gambling industry, of course. In fact, they’re as old as the industry it self, but there are suggestions that incidents associated with actions that are unwelcome been growing. Some experts even claim that assaults across all industries that are online doubled in 2014.

High-profile operators on the receiving end last year included Betfair, which was targeted on Grand National time, the biggest UK horse race meet regarding the year when it comes to betting.

Attackers usually time their efforts to coincide with large events that are sporting the hope that operators will simply pay up as opposed to lose company. PokerStars, Unibet, and state that is swedish monopoly Svenska Spel will also be all recent victims.

Chances of Prosecution Slim

Inspite of the interruption that is initial it appears that the situation is currently stable and contains been effectively dealt with by the nj-new Jersey market’s cybersecurity teams. The battle between online gambling sites therefore the hackers is one of pet and mouse, of strategy and counterstrategy: as security technology improves, so do the hackers’ efforts to breach it.

New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement President David Rebuck said this week that the matter was now being investigated by state authorities, the FBI, and the New Jersey Office of Homeland Security and Preparedness, along with their very own company. The agencies that are various he said, were hunting a ‘known actor’ who had ‘done this before.’

Chances of prosecution are slim, nevertheless. Up to now, just two men have been convicted for launching DDoS attacks. Those were two UK-based Poles who made the mistake of threatening an operator they knew personally and agreeing to meet up him in a resort space. The operator, of program, brought law enforcement with him. In 2013, the pair that is hapless sentenced to 5 years in prison by a court in great britain.

LVS Attack

Such attacks are not limited to online gambling, of course. In February 2014, Las Vegas Sands Corporation (LVS), owned by anti-online curmudgeon Sheldon Adelson, had been afflicted by a massive cyber assault that ended up being believed to possess emanated from Iran. On February 10, LVS was plunged into chaos as computers began flatlining and servers shutting down. Hard disks were wiped clean as malware ripped through the business’s networks.

The decision was taken to sever the multibillion dollar operation completely from the Internet as hackers began compressing and downloading batches of sensitive files, comprising everything from high-roller credit checks to details of global computer systems.

The attack caused an estimated $20 million worth of damage. The attackers subsequently claimed their DDoS actions had been been motivated after hearing remarks made by Adelson in 2013 about ‘dropping the bomb’ on Iran.

NY Casino License Bidding Process Receives One Applicant

Tiago Downs, the sole bidder for the 4th NY casino license, proposes an improved expansion package having failed to impress last December. (Image:

Regulators in New York State have actually slim pickings once they come to choose regarding the winner for the 4th Upstate casino license in the economically deprived Southern Tier region.

Just one contender submitted a proposition for Monday’s deadline, while a rival pulled out at the minute that is last.

The Tioga Downs racino in Nichols is the one and only applicant for the area, with a $195 million expansion proposal to its current center.

The aborted proposal, from businessman Jeffrey C. Hyman, was pulled having been dealt ‘a fatal blow’ by the state’s Department of Environmental Conservation.

Hyman said his project might have been ‘seismic,’ which may have been what the ecological everyone was complaining about in the first place, particularly when you consider there is an ongoing debate about fracking in the area.


Unfortunately, Jeff Gural, owner of Tioga Downs, failed to wow the Gaming Control Board at the original certification hearing with their task in December 2014, although he has since come up with an improved package.

In those days, the board recommended three casino licenses, for Monticello, in the Catskills; Schenectady; and the Finger Lakes area, snubbing the Southern Tier and Tioga Downs entirely, despite having been issued the powers to suggest a license that is fourth.

Gural was furious during the decision and extremely critical of the board. He argued that a casino in the Southern Tier would be perfectly rational, because the closest competitor is Mohegan Sun at Pocono Downs, 90 miles south in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania

‘It’s got nothing to complete with me personally, I have enough money,’ he fumed. ‘But the folks of the Southern Tier?’

‘And what really pisses me off,’ he continued, warming to his theme, ‘is the governor asked me to spend $800,000 of my money to pass Local legislation 1, Proposition One [on the expansion of casino gaming]. What was that all about? I mean… the thing that is whole sickening to tell the truth with you.’


Such had been the outcry among locals, in fact, that Governor Andrew Cuomo intervened, requesting that the Gaming Commission reconsider.

‘As this will be the license that is last in New York State, it might probably excite national competition by interested events that submit better still applications than the very first round,’ advised Cuomo. ‘ If you agree to the request, the [casino board] should quickly establish an activity for the fourth license that could be complete as expeditiously as possible, as the Southern Tier needs jobs and investment now.’

The board complied, a decision it may now be sorry for, as it finds itself facing a ‘bidding war’ of one and under political stress to honor a permit to a man who has already been highly critical of its decision making processes.