Nyc Casino Voter Referendum Wording Challenged by Attorney

A November ny State casino referendum for voters has one attorney questioning the ballot’s wording

In November, ny voters are scheduled to vote for a referendum that will enable several casino that is new to be built through the state. But if one Brooklyn attorney is effective, that referendum will be halted due to language within the ballot question he claims violates state law.

Referendum Language Questioned

The language in the referendum features a amount of ‘legislative purposes’ that paint the proposal in a light that is unmistakably positive. For example, the concern mentions ‘promoting job growth, increasing aid to schools and allowing regional governments to lower property taxes.’ That language was authorized by the State Board of Elections in July.

But now, lawyer Eric J. Snyder is contending that the language in the bill violates New York legislation. In accordance with case filed in the New York State Supreme Court, Snyder alleges that the language violates the continuing State Constitution’s prohibition on the utilization of general public profit the aid of ‘private undertakings.’

‘The Constitution is pretty clear that you can’t use public cash to sway or influence a vote,’ Snyder said.

Snyder isn’t the one that is only has brought up problems with the language within the referendum. Many government watchdog groups also notice it as one-sided, and groups that are religious also noted the language used whenever telling parishioners to consider social ills that could come with the advertised benefits of casino expansion.

Interestingly, the original language in the referendum didn’t mention some of the benefits which are set appearing in the ballot question that is final. Whenever the first draft arrived from the state attorney general’s office, the language was more direct and didn’t include the legislative purposes. Those showed up only following the Board of Elections changed the wording, after exactly what co-chairman Douglas Kellner said were ‘extensive discussions.’

Wording Can Outcome that is affect Speaking

The language of the ballot concern might seem such as for instance a trivial thing to battle over, but history shows time and once again that even minor changes to the title or wording of legislation may have an important effect on public opinion, and which has proven real yet again in this case.

According up to a poll by Siena College, 55% of New York voters were in favor regarding the referendum when they were read the question because it is scheduled to appear on the November 5 ballot, with 42% compared. But when voters were instead expected a similar question with more neutral language, they certainly were evenly divided on the issue.

That ‘advocating language’ is exactly what Snyder whom also opposes casino expansion physically says should cause the court to enjoin voting on the bill until more basic language was place in its destination.

‘It is partisan, and it really is having an effect,’ Snyder stated. ‘And that’s not the us government’s role.’

The success of the referendum is in some doubt regardless of the language used despite the promising poll numbers. With no statewide elections set for November, turnout is probable to be low in many towns. But in New York City, a contested mayor’s race will likely lead to higher turnout there and voters within the town are more skeptical about the casino expansion than voters in all of those other state.

For Tribal Gaming Lobby, it’s really a Tough Row to Hoe in Congress

Scenes like this one, of tribal gaming lobbyists working their dilemmas in Congress, are not creating many results these days

An awful lot of individuals are unhappy with the direction or absence thereof of the United States Congress in 2010. Now you can add Native American tribes that operate gambling enterprises across the country compared to that long list.

No Respect in Congress for Tribal Issues

Discussing the lack of any legislation that is federal clarify and regulate the new relative Wild West that is state-by-state online gambling in the U.S. these days, John Gusik a founding partner regarding the Washington D.C.-based legislation and government relations services outfit called the Franklin Partnership, had this to express at the recent worldwide Gaming Expo (G2E) in Las Vegas: ‘There were 4,500 bills in Congress this year; only 31 have been enacted. It’s a do-nothing Congress. Seventy-two bills dealing with tribal issues and none have been enacted. Web gaming continues to languish in Congress.’

Although the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 established the framework for Native casinos that are american benefit this until-then underclass economically, it has not all been champagne and roses for many of this tribes, who nevertheless grapple with basic issues such as better education and health care with regards to their members. And now as legal online poker in Nevada and imminently, appropriate online casino gambling in nj-new Jersey and Maryland simply take hold the Indian ‘special nation’ status vis a vis gambling enterprises are threatened, particularly as gambling industry executives warn of impending market saturation throughout the majority of the U.S. that will affect the whole market.

Clearly, all the drama surrounding health care and also the government shutdown hasn’t exactly helped put concentrate on Indian casino industry issues either.

Casino Money Isn’t Enough, Lobbyists Insist

The National Indian Gaming Commission showed $27.9 billion in gaming revenues in 2012, which is up 2.6 percent from $27.2 billion in 2011, so the tribes may have trouble garnering sympathy that is much anybody in a still unsteady economy, but lobbyists says there is more on the line for the tribes than simply revenue.

‘If you represent tribes, they think you need to work on Indian gaming all the time,’ said Pete Kirkham, who runs Red Maple Consulting, a federal government affairs and political strategy firm, and works with many of the tribes on various legislative issues. ‘ Gaming takes up some right time but it is also about health care, training and housing.’

Kirkham says they are nevertheless waiting on 13 appropriation bills that the tribes importance of funding. He says that while the majority of tribal income is gaming-derived, that much of it goes directly back in the city.

‘Everything is now seen through the prism of gaming,’ said Jana McKeag, president of Lowry Strategies, an Alexandria, Va., government and public affairs consulting firm. ‘Congress believes that tribes have all this video gaming money … why do they need (federal dollars)?’

Other issues that tribal lobbyists want addressed involve the profusion of off-reservation casinos in areas where those gambling enterprises might take business far from the Indian ones. Also, the proliferation of Internet cafes in states like California, Florida, and vermont are seen as an issue the whole video gaming industry must deal with.

‘In California, as an example, they have been unlawful but the state doesn’t have money to shut them down,’ McKeag noted on the panel that is g2E. ‘They are not regulated and are an chance for cash laundering. The problem is when they shut them down, they just pop up somewhere else.’

Meanwhile, with everything taking place in Congress right now, it doesn’t look like tribal gaming problems are going to go on to leading of the relative line any time soon.

Casinos Ready to Add Nostalgia-Based Skill Games to Their Rosters

Slot manufacturer IGT has reintroduced the old Centipede game for slots to touch into the nostalgia craze

As it pertains to the games they provide, casinos are often careful to restrict simply how much players can influence the games through unique ability. Sure, blackjack and video clip poker offer players the opportunity to make skillful choices, but even perfect play nevertheless renders the casino with a small advantage (and if you overcome that through card counting, they can always just stop letting you play). Many other games, like slots, are completely based on random luck.

Everything Old is New Again

However with casinos trying to find new avenues with which to attract clients, it seems like skill-based video gaming may be coming to a venue near you. That’s your message from the Global Gaming Expo (G2E), where manufacturers had been showing off games that allow players to make use of their skills in an attempt to offer them a better possiblity to win cash.

The biggest hit that was seen at G2E in this genre is a machine developed by International Game Technology. IGT has made a machine on the basis of the 1981 hit arcade game Centipede, in which players shoot digital bugs in order to score points.

Centipede ended up being originally developed by Atari, an ongoing company that has very long since passed its heyday. But IGT along with other manufacturers are hoping to cash in on a wave of nostalgia that may attract middle-aged gamblers whom have fond memories of playing very early games that are arcade.

In the casino form of Centipede, the points that players score could be directly translated into money. Needless to say, the casino nevertheless wants to have the benefit, so you’ll want to get lucky to enter into bonus rounds and even the absolute most skilled player will be an underdog in the long run against the casino.

Playing Against Other Players on Machines

But that is not where games like Centipede plan on stopping. The device additionally allows two players to get head-to-head on the machines, with the better player walking away because of the winnings. That’s a true battle of ability, much like how players can satisfy one another at the poker table, with the casino taking only a small cut to ensure they profit.

Baby boomers aren’t the only ones that IGT and other manufacturers (WMS and Aristocrat both say they have skill-based games into the works) are hoping that these games can pull in; these businesses also want to lure more youthful players to slots, which traditionally were the bailiwick of an older demographic. A couple of new games by Bally Technologies even incorporate leader boards in order in an attempt to get players right back into the habit of wanting high ratings.

‘The casino would love it if players are like, ‘Oh, I got beat! I need to return back and play some more to get in the lead,” stated Bally spokesman Mike Trask. ‘if they were 15 years old in 1985 playing against their friends, trying to get the score that is highest, that person is almost 50 years old now, and so they’re right in the demographic.’

Others believe that the key will be players that are matching head-to-head skill competitions with money at risk. It has become a reality in online video games, and some see casinos could perform some exact same thing.

‘Let me play Madden football, allow me play EA Hockey,’ stated Geoff Freeman, head of the United states Gaming Association. ‘ We’ll place $20 down, the winner gets $15 and the house gets $5.’

However, casino experts point out that these sorts of experiences will probably only amount to a niche market in the industry. In the end, they state, casinos still make far more money when gamblers play against them than if they simply take on each other.