Poker superstar Phil Ivey has received approval that is preliminary A las vegas medical marijuana dispensary license in Nevada.
Phil Ivey is not smoking one thing, but their future customers may be: Ivey received one of 26 initial license approvals for a medical marijuana dispensary through the Las Vegas City Council early in the day this week, possibly making the poker superstar one of the first operators in the city to provide pot to consumers.
There are still further actions necessary before Ivey gets approval that is final open such a business, but his approval does mean that the city found him qualified to move on in the licensing procedure.
This week to plead their cases for medical marijuana licenses about 50 potential operators went before the City Council. Those that got approval that is preliminary the city will now have to be approved by the state health division.
The City Council will sooner or later hold a final suitability conference for people approved by the state before awarding a limited number of licenses that have been set aside for Las Vegas.
This means that Ivey still has a long way to go before getting a final go-ahead to dispense medical marijuana in Sin City. But if he makes his way through the various licensing stages, Ivey might end up slinging weed in the same way prolifically as he makes pot-sized bets at the poker table.
Council Split on Licensing Process
There’s been a great deal of controversy over just how Las vegas, nevada has handled the pot licensing process, though which has more regarding procedural questions than any such thing Ivey or just about any potential licensee has done.
Councilman Bob Coffin introduced a motion to delay the proceedings until after Nevada regulators weigh in on the suitability of each of the candidates week that is next. He worried that making public opinions on applicants before the state made its own suggestions could possibly lead to lawsuits, and that waiting could permit the city to approach the issue with an ‘unbiased eye.’
But that motion ultimately failed, as a vote on the issue completed in a 3-3 tie. Councilwoman Lois Tarkanian and councilman Ricki Barlow also voted to delay the procedures, while Mayor Carolyn Goodman, wife of infamous ex-mayor Oscar and mother of an applicatant herself, abstained from the vote.
Among the many applicants that had been approved were developer James Hammer, restaurant owner Michael Morton, and political consultant David Thomas. Nuleaf, a Las Vegas-based company that is owned by a team that operates dispensaries in Ca, had been denied for a license.
‘we believe waiting could have made a difference,’ Nuleaf spokesman Bradley Mayer said. ‘We feel confident that the state will find we have been a very qualified applicant.’
Ivey Headliner of this 12 Months
That is simply the newest in a string of headlines made by Ivey that have nothing at all to do with his skills that are prodigious the poker table.
Probably the biggest headlines have been made in their various edge-sorting cases against Crockfords therefore the Borgata. Ivey already destroyed the Crockfords situation in britain’s High Court of Justice, costing him over $12 million in winnings. a case that is similar the Atlantic City casino is nevertheless pending, although in that case, it’s the casino that is pursuing recourse to have its payouts came back. Ivey contends that the strategies he found in the games usually do not represent cheating, while the casinos, maybe not interestingly, disagree.
Final Saturday, Ivey also shut straight down the Ivey Poker web site, ending operations just 18 months after the Facebook poker program launched. However, the poker legend said that the closed down was simply a transition for the product.
Southern Africa Online Gambling Ban Stirs Debate
South Africa is considering a ban on online gambling, along with stronger regulations for land-based betting, such as electronic bingo terminals like these. (Image: OnlineCasinoArchives.co.za)
South Africa’s government is proposing a ban on a range that is wide of activities, including all forms of online gambling and other activities such as dog racing. That proposition is being discussed by the National Gambling Policy Council, which features people from both the national and provincial governments, as well as the Department of Trade and Industry.
Based on department officials, the government believes it has the capability to enforce laws on gambling, and that its unclear how jobs that are many created by the web gambling industry. It could also hardly be an unprecedented move, as many other jurisdictions throughout the world have outlawed Web gambling within the past.
Democratic Alliance Favors Regulation Over Ban
But while some government officials had been enthusiastic concerning the prospect, the notion of an outright ban was highly denounced by the opposition Democratic Alliance.
‘That is just a very, extremely decision that is bad’ said DA trade and industry spokesperson Geordin Hill-Lewis. ‘we fiercely disagree with that view. It’s completely shortsighted to say that it is better for South Africans not to ever be permitted to gamble online if you have patently significant demand in the country to achieve that. It is for government to facilitate that into the safest way possible.’
The DA position is that online gambling is better controlled through regulation, rather than an outright ban in other words. a ban that is full Hill-Lewis said, would price far an excessive amount of in resources to enforce.
But Department of Trade and Industry Deputy Director-General Zodwa Ntuli said that the specific circumstances in South Africa meant that a ban could be good public policy. She pointed down that the department’s proposal was made after recognizing that South Africa had a level that is relatively high of gambling and debt contrasted with many countries.
Electronic Bingo Terminals Could Be Limited
If the department’s tips were to become law, it wouldn’t trigger a widespread ban of all gambling activities in the nation, but would rather restrict just what will be allowed associated with the conventional kinds of gaming that are already present in South Africa. There would be further controls placed on electronic bingo terminals, which are currently allowed by provincial governments, despite the fact that there is no policy that is national the devices.
That conflict caused Trade and Industry Minister Rob Davies to issue a moratorium on any further licenses for the devices. The recommendations that are new see a cap on the number of machines allowed nationwide. It would additionally attempt to get a handle on the ease of access to these machines, with officials saying that gambling must not be allowed in shopping malls, for instance.
The new regulations would likewise incorporate a framework for allowing the federal government to better oversee the horse racing industry. While few details were available, it appeared that the most significant changes there would come in the issuing of licenses, a procedure through which the federal government could impact modification on the market.
Gambling regulation in South Africa resembles that regarding the United States and Canada, at least with regards to the interplay between federal and local governments. While the government that is federal national policy, it is up to individual provinces to decide how each will issue licenses and gather revenues from gambling tasks.
Massachusetts Casino Repeal Vote Happens Tuesday
Despite long odds, anti-casino forces remain hoping for a victory in Massachusetts. A ‘yes’ vote means ‘no casinos’. (Image: Repeal the Casino Deal)
A vote that will either lead to Massachusetts casino repeal or to the matter being put to bed forever is coming on Tuesday, though it would just take a major upset for anti-casino advocates to get their way on Election Day. Those trying to defeat casinos are confusingly searching for voters to vote ‘Yes’ on Question 3, an idea that will put end to the 2012 legislation that is allowing the state to license gaming houses throughout the state.
Based on the latest study by the Western New England University Polling Institute, 59 % of likely voters within the state plan to vote ‘No’ on the ballot question, meaning ‘yes’ to legal casinos. Only 35 % plan to vote ‘yes,’ in benefit of the repeal. Those figures represent a major gain for pro-casino forces, since a September poll showed just an 11 percent advantage for ‘no’ voters.
Of course, that’s assuming voters don’t get completely bewildered by the unintuitive ‘yes/no’ phrasing of the ballot initiative itself.
Religious Voters Support Repeal
The numbers show that there has been some success in efforts by spiritual leaders to get parishioners to oppose the casino law, with regular churchgoers being more inclined to vote ‘yes’ than their non-attending counterparts. But even Catholics whom attend mass every are opposed to repeal by a 17 percent margin week. In reality, Protestant voters who worship regularly make up about the only real demographic that favor repeal, doing this by a 55-45 margin.
Meanwhile, the advertising efforts by casinos and their allies appear to have been very effective. Support for the repeal https://slotsforfun-ca.com/quick-hits-slot-review/ in Western Massachusetts is reduced somewhat compared to in prior polls, perhaps as a result of advertising that touted some great benefits of the planned MGM casino in Springfield.
Battle Over Pros and Consequences
But while anti-casino advocates may be dealing with long odds on Tuesday, they’re nevertheless fighting within the final moments to get their message out. Teams like Repeal the Casino Deal believe that the casinos will offer you almost no economic benefit to the people of Massachusetts, while increasing unlawful activity and gambling addiction.
‘ The money isn’t coming to the social people of Massachusetts,’ said Al Cabot, an anti-casino advocate. ‘This is actually money that’s going from one or two casinos in Connecticut to three casinos in Massachusetts.’
Unsurprisingly, those into the casino industry see things just a bit that is little. According to MGM Springfield President Mike Mathis, his company’s casino will produce thousands of jobs and bring tens of millions of dollars in economic stimulus to the city.
‘we have seen exactly what 25 years of no casino may do,’ Mathis stated. ‘We’d like a chance.’
Mathis additionally disputes the idea that casinos would simply be taking money that is already invested in Massachusetts and moving it to spending at his company’s resort.
‘A third of our customers are coming from Connecticut,’ Mathis said. ‘This concept that money is falling through the sky or we’re cannibalizing the market that is local just inaccurate.’
Casinos in Massachusetts: Pre-Election Status
Therefore far, three licenses have been granted to create gambling venues in Massachusetts. Combined with the MGM casino in Springfield, Wynn Resorts had been the winner of the Greater Boston license, beating out a competing plan by Mohegan Sun at Suffolk Downs in Revere. A license ended up being also awarded to Penn National to develop a slots parlor in Plainridge.
While casino opponents may come up short at the polls, simply getting the question on the ballot was something of a victory. Although campaigners collected more than enough signatures to place the casino concern up to a referendum, Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley originally rejected the question, forcing a showdown in their state’s Supreme Court over whether it might ultimately appear on this year’s ballot.